A Structured, Consultant-Led Clinical Pathway
THE CANN-ABI CLINICAL PATHWAY
Medical cannabis prescribing for Acquired Brain Injury requires careful governance, neuropsychiatric oversight and formalised risk management.
Cann-ABI operates a staged, consultant-led pathway designed specifically for complex ABI presentations.
HOW THE PATHWAY WORKS
Every patient progresses through three defined stages
1. Instruction & Capacity Review
2. Specialist Neuropsychiatric Assessment & Protocol Design
3. Tiered Maintenance & Ongoing Clinical Monitoring
Movement between stages is conditional upon safety, documentation and suitability.
STAGE 1
Instruction, Eligibility & Capacity Review
1.1 Referral & Instruction
Where capacity may be impaired, referrals must originate via:
Case Manager
Court-appointed Deputy
Legal representative
Responsible clinician within an existing MDT
Self-referrals may be considered only where capacity is clearly intact.
1.2 Treatment Resistance Confirmation
In line with UK prescribing guidance, the following must be demonstrated:
Failure of at least two licensed treatments
Inadequate symptom control or intolerable side effects
Persistent functional impairment
A Summary Care Record (SCR) is retrieved from the GP to confirm:
Current medications
Relevant diagnoses
Cardiovascular history
Seizure history
Psychiatric history
No assessment proceeds without record verification.
1.3 Mental Capacity Assessment
Capacity is assessed in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The clinician evaluates whether the patient can:
Understand the nature of CBMP treatment
Retain relevant information
Weigh risks and benefits
Communicate a decision
Where capacity is lacking:
A Best Interests framework is initiated
Deputy / MDT consultation occurs
A written Best Interests rationale is documented
This documentation forms part of the permanent clinical record.
1.4 Risk Screening & Exclusion Criteria
Before progression to Stage 2, screening includes:
Active psychosis
Unstable mania
Significant cardiovascular instability
Uncontrolled epilepsy
Active substance misuse beyond harm-reduction scope
High-risk patients may require stabilisation prior to consideration.
STAGE 2
Specialist Neuropsychiatric Assessment & Protocol Design
Initial Assessment: £495
Protocol Setup: £645
Duration: 60 minutes (Consultant Psychiatrist)
2.1 Comprehensive Neuropsychiatric Evaluation
Assessment domains include:
A. ABI-Specific Review
- Executive dysfunction
- Impulsivity
- Emotional regulation
- Social communication deficits
- Frontal lobe behavioural syndromes
B. Psychiatric Stability
- Mood disorders
- Trauma history
- Anxiety spectrum symptoms
- Psychosis vulnerability
- Forensic history
C. Neurological Considerations
- Seizure threshold
- Head injury severity
- Sleep disruption patterns
- Cognitive slowing baseline
2.2 Harm-Reduction Suitability Matrix
Where illicit cannabis use is present, the clinician evaluates:
Current street use frequency
Risk of exploitation or financial coercion
Forensic vulnerability
Impact on rehabilitation engagement
The aim is structured replacement with monitored prescribing where appropriate — not reinforcement of dependency.
2.3 Risk-Benefit Formulation
A formal clinical formulation is produced including:
Target symptoms
Expected therapeutic aims
Potential adverse effects
Functional improvement goals
Safeguarding considerations
Only where the benefit-risk ratio is appropriate does prescribing proceed.
2.4 Protocol Design & Titration Framework
Where clinically suitable, a personalised treatment protocol is established. Typical structure may include:
Baseline Stabilisation:
THC:CBD oil for systemic regulation
Daytime Activation:
Sativa-dominant cartridge via medical vaporiser
Night-time Sleep Regulation:
Indica-dominant cartridge
All prescribing is:
Vaporiser-only
Medical-grade device controlled
Smoking strictly prohibited
Clear titration schedules are documented.
STAGE 3
Tier 1 – Sustain Tier
£300 per month
Suitable for:
Behaviourally stable individuals
Lower forensic risk
Predictable presentation
Includes:
Monthly Clinical Nurse Specialist review (20 minutes)
Structured side-effect checklist
Script authorisation
Deputy liaison as required
Escalation to Tier 2 occurs if instability emerges.
Tier 2 – Complex Care Tier
£600 per month
Designed for:
Ongoing behavioural volatility
Active MDT involvement
Court-linked reporting requirements
High exploitation vulnerability
Includes:
Monthly Consultant Psychiatrist review (30–45 minutes)
Enhanced MDT communication
Court-ready summaries where required
Intensive risk monitoring
Tiered Maintenance & Ongoing Oversight
Prescribing without structured follow-up is unsafe in ABI populations. Patients are allocated to one of two monitoring tiers.
ONGOING MONITORING FRAMEWORK
Each monthly review includes structured documentation across:
Safety Monitoring
Tachycardia or cardiovascular symptoms
Breakthrough seizures
Mood activation or paranoia
Cognitive Impact
Fatigue
Executive function changes
Engagement with rehabilitation
Adherence
Vaporiser hygiene
Inhalation count monitoring
Reduction in illicit cannabis use
Safeguarding
Exploitation indicators
Financial coercion risk
“Cuckooing” vulnerability
DRIVING & LEGAL ADVICE
Patients are:
Informed of UK driving regulations regarding THC
Advised not to drive if impaired
Provided written guidance
Legal compliance is documented at initiation and reviewed periodically.
ESCALATION & REVIEW PROCESS
The pathway is dynamic. Escalation triggers include:
Psychiatric destabilisation
Cardiovascular adverse events
Seizure threshold concerns
Forensic risk increase
Treatment may be:
Adjusted
Paused
Escalated to higher tier
Discontinued
Clinical safety overrides continuation.
DISCONTINUATION POLICY
Where clinically suitable, a personalised treatment protocol is established. Typical structure may include:
Baseline Stabilisation:
THC:CBD oil for systemic regulation
Daytime Activation:
Sativa-dominant cartridge via medical vaporiser
Night-time Sleep Regulation:
Indica-dominant cartridge
All prescribing is:
Vaporiser-only
Medical-grade device controlled
Smoking strictly prohibited
Clear titration schedules are documented.
AUDIT & GOVERNANCE STANDARDS
Cann-ABI maintains:
100% GP notification compliance
100% capacity documentation compliance
Yellow Card reporting for serious adverse events
Formal audit review of safety and efficacy metrics
Efficacy indicators include:
Sleep improvement
Anxiety reduction
Reduction in crisis behaviours
Decrease in illicit cannabis use
Summary
The Cann-ABI pathway is designed for:
Structured oversight
Legal compliance
Neuropsychiatric precision
Behavioural stabilisation
Risk reduction
This is specialist prescribing within governance — not consumer cannabis access.
Frequently Asked Questions
The information provided addresses common enquiries about our clinical pathway, legal framework, safety processes and treatment approach.
If your question is not covered, our team can provide further guidance through the appropriate enquiry pathway.
CBMPs may be considered where conventional treatments have not adequately controlled symptoms such as agitation, anxiety or sleep disturbance, or where side effects have been problematic. While research into the use of Cannabis-Based Medicinal Products (CBMPs) for Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) is still evolving, early clinical evidence and patient reports suggest they may play a supportive role in managing complex, treatment-resistant symptoms.
For many ABI survivors, CBMPs—which contain varying ratios of CBD and THC—are considered for their potential to alleviate neuropathic pain, spasticity, severe sleep disturbances, and secondary anxiety. Emerging studies also highlight the neuroprotective properties of certain cannabinoids, which may assist in modulating neuroinflammation.
Treatment may aim to support:
Emotional regulation
Sleep stabilisation
Anxiety reduction
Behavioural control
Harm reduction where illicit use exists
No. CBMPs do not reverse brain injury. They may support management of symptoms in selected cases.
No. Suitability depends on individual factors including psychiatric history, cardiovascular health and risk profile.
Treatment may not be appropriate where there is:
Active psychosis
Severe cardiovascular instability
High risk of adverse psychological reactions
Inability to meet governance requirements
Adverse effects are possible and may include anxiety, cognitive slowing or cardiovascular changes. This is why structured monitoring is essential.
Where appropriate, structured prescribing may reduce risks associated with unregulated products and exploitation. Each case is assessed individually.
The aim is stabilisation and risk reduction, not reinforcement of dependency.
Treatment may include oils or vaporised products delivered via medical-grade devices. Smoking is not permitted.
Frequency depends on the monitoring tier and clinical stability. Monthly reviews are typical.
Outcomes vary but may include improved sleep, reduced agitation and enhanced stability in daily functioning.
Treatment may be adjusted or discontinued where benefits are insufficient or risks increase.